Archive

Archive for the ‘Shapiro & Mack DUI and Criminal Law’ Category

Police officer reassigned over allegations she committed perjury – LISTEN TO THE AUDIO!!

June 14th, 2010
ummmm....WELLL.....maybe I wasn't there.....ummm...uhhhh - COME ON!

ummmm....WELLL.....maybe I wasn't there.....ummm...uhhhh - COME ON!!

****AUDIO: Listen to the May 20 preliminary hearing NOW!!!*** caught red-handed! ouch!

Officer First Class Megan Mattingly, a member of the Frederick Police Department’s drug enforcement unit, has been reassigned to administrative duties while authorities investigate allegations she committed perjury during a May 20 preliminary hearing, Police Capt. Kevin Grubb said Wednesday.

Frederick Police Chief Kim Dine reassigned Mattingly, a five-year veteran, on May 25, Grubb said.

Mattingly will remain out of uniform handling administrative tasks pending the outcome of the investigation, the department’s general practice when allegations of wrongdoing are raised, Grubb said.

The officer’s annual pay of $50,245 and benefits remain unchanged, Grubb said.

On Thursday, Mattingly’s attorney, Patrick J. McAndrew, declined to discuss specifics of the matter.

“This case is not what it appears to be and is actually quite complex,” McAndrew said. “We are confident all of this will be sorted out through investigation.”

The Frederick Police Department has asked the Montgomery County Police Department to investigate what happened, Grubb said.

No criminal charges have been filed.

Mattingly’s problems surfaced three weeks ago during a hearing in Frederick County District Court to determine whether there was sufficient evidence to forward felony drug charges against Harold L. Coleman Jr., 41, of Sykesville to Circuit Court for trial.

On March 31, Mattingly arrested Coleman and charged him with two felony offenses of possession with intent to distribute drugs and two misdemeanor possession offenses.

In a statement of charges she typed up and signed under oath — and later testified to May 20 before District Judge W. Milnor Roberts — Mattingly said she saw Coleman drive up and park his car at 5:05 p.m. March 31 in the 300 block of Adam Road.

She testified she saw Coleman get out of his car, open the hood, remove a white bag from under the hood and walk into a residence.

“The problem Officer Mattingly had is that she wasn’t in the area to make those observations,” defense attorney Norman Usiak said Tuesday.

“What she testified to was derived from a call from a neighbor to the communications staff at the Frederick Police Department,” Usiak said.

In police recordings March 31 after the witness’s call is received, Mattingly says she’s been at the police department writing a warrant, but that she’ll respond to investigate the witness’s report, Usiak said.

While cross-examining Mattingly during the preliminary hearing May 20, Usiak pressed her on her testimony about what she had seen herself.

Several times, he reminded her she was under oath, drawing more than half a dozen objections from Assistant State’s Attorney Michael J. Moore.

Usiak specifically questioned her whereabouts when the call came in.

A 30-minute audiotape of the hearing reveals a number of exchanges between the defense lawyer and the officer.

“You were at the (police) station filling out a search warrant when the complaint was made?” Usiak said.

“Lee and Long (other officers) were in the area,” Mattingly replied.

“They inquired if you could get there directly?” Usiak said, reminding her they said they were involved with something else.

“I was writing my warrant,” she said.

“You didn’t observe my client operate the vehicle, did you?” Usiak asked.

“Cpl. Lee observed, and I wrote it in my report,” she replied.

“You didn’t observe these things, did you?”

“No,” she said.

“You put in your police report a lie,” Usiak said.

“Objection,” Moore said.

“Yes, because we write it (the police report) in the first person when we are the charging officer,” Mattingly said.

Usiak argued Mattingly’s dubious testimony against his client should not be given any credibility because she did not witness any of what she testified to herself.

“This officer has perjured herself … whether by naivet? or (inaudible) … she perjured herself,” Usiak said. “And she continued that perjury until it was drawn out of her.”

Roberts issued his ruling instantaneously.

“The felony charges … due to the issue of credibility, the charges are dismissed,” the judge said.

Prosecutors followed suit six days later, moving to drop the misdemeanor charges against Coleman as well, according to a letter from Moore to Cecelia Herring, a District Court clerk.

“The state declines to prosecute,” Moore wrote.

State’s Attorney Charlie Smith declined to comment on the situation involving Mattingly, an officer who has filed charges in at least 172 cases, according to court records.

“Due to the judge’s ruling that the testimony in (the Coleman case) was not credible, we had no other choice but to dismiss the entire case,” Smith said.

“I can tell you that we have procedures in place to deal with the sponsoring of witnesses, meaning whether or not we will continue to call that person as a credible witness, and whether perjury allegations should be pursued,” Smith said.

Any credible allegation of a state witness committing perjury is immediately referred to another state’s attorney’s office to avoid any conflict of interest, he said.

Fraternal Order of Police President Charlie Snyder said the FOP stands behind Mattingly.

“We need to let the investigation take its course, and we’ll get to the bottom of everything,” Snyder said.

Grubb said the allegations are difficult to fathom.

“I’ve not heard of anything of this nature in my 21 years here,” he said.

Grubb said the police department takes all allegations against it seriously.

“We will do whatever is necessary to have this investigated fully,” he said. “We hold our people accountable.”

Usiak said many police officers always testify truthfully, but not all.

“An officer lying under oath in court isn’t uncommon,” Usiak said. “It isn’t uncommon for a president to lie under oath. Police officers are humans, and they’re flawed just like everybody else. Too many of them think they are above the law.”

“Some may make a mistake or misstate something. But this was an outright lie.”

Once word got out about Roberts’ ruling, that he did not find the police officer’s testimony credible, Usiak said defense lawyers countywide were lining up to get recordings of the hearing.

“I think (the state has) been dumping cases ever since,” the defense attorney said.

Usiak said he was pleased the state’s attorney’s office agreed to look at Officer Mattingly’s cases, including a review of her testimony May 20.

“Normally, prosecutors coddle police,” he said.

Usiak praised Roberts for his display of fearlessness and ethics from the bench.

Time and again, when Moore objected to Usiak’s questions, “Judge Roberts demanded that the officer answer. Unfortunately, not every judge in Frederick County would do that.”

Coleman said he is grateful to Usiak for defending him with gusto, but he thinks there still is more justice to be done.

He wants to see Mattingly placed in the defendant’s chair.

“She was going to send me to my grave, and she knew she wasn’t there,” Coleman said.

“I’m not an angel, but don’t lie against me.”

Author: admin Categories: Shapiro & Mack DUI and Criminal Law Tags:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY POLICE CORRUPTION – bad stops/false tickets – something must be done! PLEASE COMMENT!

June 30th, 2009

WHAT’S GOING ON AROUND HERE?? Tow Truck Driver Wrote Tickets Using Montgomery County Police Officer’s Book

 

While parking spaces reserved for guests sit empty, residents of the Fenshire Farms Town home community in Gaithersburg have to park a half mile away to avoid being ticketed or towed.

Cliff Rehder’s stepdad was nabbed.

“He had to go bail out his car and pay a couple hundred dollars for parking across the street from his house,” Rehder says.

Residents say they feel like a local towing company is stalking them, lying in wait to catch unsuspecting residents.

“They are always waiting across the street, searching every 15 minutes, ” Muzoffgur Nay says. It cost him $300 to get his towed car back.

Montgomery County Police have confirmed that one of their officers, Jennifer Phoenix, gave her ticket book to a tow truck operator at G and G towing in Rockville. That driver wrote $50 dollar tickets and the company also towed several cars.

Police Spokesman Lt. Paul Starks says Phoenix wasn’t authorized to give her ticket book to anyone.

“No, she wasn’t,” Starks says. “Internal Affairs looked into it and has taken action. We can’t discuss details since it’s a personnel matter. But she is an officer in good standing in this department. She has not resigned.”

Officer Phoenix has only been on the force four years, but this isn’t the first time she’s been accused of wrongdoing. She’s one of four Montgomery County police officers being sued by a local woman who says she was beaten and tasered while handcuffed.”

“I’ve lost so much. I’ll never been the same,” Melissa Dents told 9NEWS NOW.

In pictures taken the day after the October 2006 incident, Dent has swollen eyes, and 13 taser marks on her back and body.Her lawyer, Dennis Ettlin says they’ve filed a $6.4 million dollar civil suit against Officer Phoenix and three others.

The owner of G & G Towing, Glen Caid would not talk with 9News.

We tried to find out what happened to the tow truck driver– his boss wouldn’t talk to us.

“It’s kind of scary,” resident Amanda Mettler says. I assume people are paying those tickets, since that’s what law abiding citizens do. They have to look into this.”

There is some good news. Police say anyone who paid one of the bogus tickets will get their money back.

 

County police apologize after officer lends ticket book to tow-truck driver

Tower issued tickets in Gaithersburg neighborhood

 

Montgomery County Police are voiding parking tickets and apologizing to residents of the Fernshire Farms neighborhood in Gaithersburg after a four-year officer gave her book of parking tickets to a tow-truck driver who issued them last month.

Residents who received tickets say the tow-truck driver identified himself as a police officer working on behalf of their homeowners association.

After a private meeting of the HOA, residents who attended said police told them the tow truck driver has been fired and the police officer has tendered her resignation.

A “limited number” of tickets were issued to vehicles in Fernshire Farms, a 342-townhome community near Quince Orchard Road and Great Seneca Highway, said Lt. Paul Starks, director of the department’s media division.

After an internal investigation, the officer and tow-truck driver are not expected to face criminal charges, he said. On Tuesday, police spokesman Cpl. Stephen Galloza confirmed that the officer was Jennifer Phoenix, a four-year county officer at the 6th District station in Gaithersburg. She could not be reached.

“This is a community where there are some legitimate parking issues,” Starks said. “This officer made some poor decisions. While we do encourage officers to work with the community, there was poor decision-making on the part of this officer … Whatever, if any, personnel action that would be taking place has taken place.”

An officer from the 6th District station apologized to residents at the Fernshire Farms HOA meeting Monday and confirmed that the man who issued the tickets has been fired from the towing company, said Larry Seeger, president of the Fernshire Farms Homeowners Association.

After The Gazette expressed interest in attending Monday’s meeting, the HOA board closed the meeting to non-homeowners on “advice from counsel and property management,” Seeger said.

Several residents leaving the meeting said that police told them that the officer had submitted her resignation, effective July 5. Galloza declined to discuss personnel matters Tuesday.

Phoenix is one of four county officers named in a $6.4 million civil lawsuit filed in federal court by a Montgomery Village woman, who alleges that the officers beat, kicked and stunned her with Tasers in her living room in 2006 after she had been handcuffed.

That lawsuit is in discovery stages in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt.

Two of the $50 parking tickets were issued to the Kawczynski family, residents of Beacon Hill Terrace for nearly 20 years.

Mark Kawczynski got his ticket May 8. Four days later, his son Nick Kawczynski — who had parked over the curb while he loaded his Buick LeSabre for the drive back to the University of South Carolina — was cited shortly after 8 a.m. May 12.

In both cases, Mark and Nancy Kawczynski said, the man identified himself as a Montgomery County police officer.

Both times the man said he was “acting on behalf of the HOA,” they said. And both tickets that he issued are signed with the surname “Phoenix.”

County parking tickets say that the signature is made “under penalty of perjury.” Starks said that the internal investigation “did not rise to that” level.

The investigation also focused on the person who issued the tickets, whom residents said police later determined was a driver for G&G Towing of Rockville.

“That matter was looked into by our Internal Affairs. They’re not moving forward at this point with criminal charges,” Galloza said.

Glen Caid, G&G’s owner, did not return calls from The Gazette.

Fernshire Farm’s property manager, Sandra Ewing of Vanguard Management Associates Inc. of Germantown, had no comment.

The Kawczynskis and other Fernshire residents interviewed Monday night said the ticketing is a case of suburban cul-de-sac parking woes gone haywire.

They traced it back to the HOA’s decision four years ago to only allow guests to park in 21 spaces on Beacon Hill Terrace, one of dozens of cul-de-sacs near Quince Orchard High School.

“Who knows what the motive was. How ridiculous,” Nancy Kawczynski said.

Author: admin Categories: Shapiro & Mack DUI and Criminal Law Tags:

Welcome to our newsblog

April 23rd, 2009

Learn more about our Howard County, Maryland law firm specializing in DUI and Criminal Defense at www.shapiroandmack.com

Author: admin Categories: Shapiro & Mack DUI and Criminal Law Tags: