those lying eyes!

By: Gene Weingarten – Washington Post

In my mind, it came down to a simple, unsettling question: Is it worse to let a drug dealer go free, or to reward the police for lying under oath?

As it turned out, my question became moot. At the end of criminal trials in D.C. Superior Court, but before deliberations, the judge discloses to the 14-person jury which two of them had been randomly selected to be alternates. I was one of the two, so I was dismissed. I never got to do what I had planned, which was to hold out for acquittal. I’d assumed my stubbornness would hang the jury, because I assumed the others would want to convict. Manifestly, the guy did it.

The case involved a routine “buy-bust” operation; according to the testimony, hundreds of these occur each month in Washington under almost identical circumstances. In this case, an undercover officer drove to a street corner in Northeast D.C. that is known for being an open-air narcotics market. He was approached on the street by a woman who was acting as an intermediary for the dealer. She took his order and his money, and then walked away from the car to meet the dealer out of sight of the buyer. It’s a system designed to stymie any police surveillance.

For that reason, in buy-bust operations, at least one other undercover officer is usually staked out elsewhere in the vicinity; in police jargon, he is the “eyes.” His job is to try to see what happens out of sight of the purchaser. Once the eyes has witnessed the transaction and can identify the seller, he radios his description of the suspect to the arrest team, which then moves in to do its job.

That’s how it worked in this case: The arrest team descended, located someone matching the radioed description and cuffed him. In the suspect’s pocket was a $10 bill with the same serial number as the bill the undercover buyer had given the intermediary. Open and shut.

At trial, the defense didn’t deny that the defendant had been caught with the incriminating money. The explanation they offered was feeble: Moments before the arrest, the defense contended, someone had asked the defendant to make change for a $10 bill. This mystery person was named but never produced or further identified. The defendant never testified, which was his right, but the only person who gave him an alibi — and his only real character witness — was his best friend, who arrived in court in police custody and testified, unconvincingly, in an orange prison jumpsuit and manacled in chains, hand to foot.

As I saw it, the defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But there was a complication.

The “eyes” officer in this case — the only person who claimed to have seen the cash and drugs change hands — testified that he had radioed the following description of the suspect: black male, black jacket, royal blue baseball hat, v-necked white t-shirt, sneakers, key on a chain around his neck, carrying a bottle of ginger ale. He said his view had been unobstructed, on a clear day, from a distance of 50 to 60 feet.

Defense lawyer Jon W. Norris produced aerial photographs to prove that this was wrong. Between the place that the eyes said he was sitting and the place the police said the transaction occurred was a full-length basketball court — 80 feet — plus a lot more pavement. Norris sent an investigator to the scene to measure the total distance: It was, the investigator testified, 172 feet. The prosecutor never contested this. He couldn’t. The discrepancy was verified by satellite imagery.

So the eyes had seen a ginger ale bottle at 172 feet? Really? That’s some set of eyes the eyes had.

One morning, my wife and I went out into the street, measured off 172 feet and stood at either end. My eyesight is 20-20 with glasses. Her eyesight is 20-20 without glasses. From that distance, I could not see a trace of the key I had hung around her neck. She could not begin to distinguish the Sprite bottle I carried from any other greenish bottle-shaped thing. From that distance, you couldn’t tell a v-neck from a crew neck or, for that matter, a T-shirt from a polo shirt.

I concluded that the eyes had lied about the specificity of his radioed description — and that he wasn’t the only one. Two other police officers who had been at the scene testified that they’d heard exactly that description, word for word, detail for detail, down to the ginger ale bottle. They said they were certain.

How could this be? Defense lawyer Norris offered a theory: The officers had colluded in a fabrication. To better justify the arrest, he said, they had improved upon what had probably been a much sketchier original description. Once they had all seen the defendant up close, in handcuffs, and examined photos of him taken at the scene, all the little details became clear: the v-neck, the key, the ginger ale bottle. Retroactively, Norris suggested, they produced a perfect description.

Hadn’t the initial description been tape-recorded? No. The D.C. police testified that they do not do that. Sending a radio message out over a recorded channel, they said, would risk that the message could be intercepted by the bad guys on a police scanner and alert them to the sting. I found myself wondering: If the police wanted to, couldn’t they just put a cheap recording device in the eyes’ car? Just for the record?

But they don’t. Possibly they don’t want the record.

As a juror, I was skeptical. As a citizen, I was angry. For one thing, I was mad about the whole case — the bewildering amount of police time and taxpayer money spent on prosecuting one guy for selling $10 worth of narcotics. But as a juror, I felt it was not my business to object to that. I would have been willing to convict a defendant despite those misgivings.

The police testimony was another matter. As witnesses, the officers had been supremely self-assured, even cocky; clearly, they’d been through this hundreds of times. As they passed the jury before and after testimony, they greeted us winningly. One of them winked at us, almost imperceptibly. Their testimony was clear, concise, professional and, in my view, dishonest.

I believe they feel themselves to be warriors fighting the good fight against bad people who have the system stacked in their favor. I believe they knew they had the right guy and were willing to cheat a little to assure a conviction.

I believe they had the right guy, too. But the willingness to cheat, I think, is a poisonous corruption of a system designed to protect the innocent at the risk of occasionally letting the guilty walk free. It’s a good system, fundamental to freedom. I think a police officer willing to cheat is more dangerous than a two-bit drug peddler.

In his charge to the jury, the judge made it clear that if we found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt — which I had — it was our duty to convict. I was prepared to defy these instructions and acquit, in the interest of a greater good. There is actually a term for this:  “jury nullification.” I was going to nullify. But I was pretty sure that in my absence, the remaining 12 would convict.

The first sign that I was wrong came just minutes after I was dismissed. The other alternate told me that she, too, felt that the defendant was guilty but that the police had lied; in her mind, the lying created reasonable doubt. She, too, would have acquitted.

Back home, I waited for word of a verdict. It didn’t come. At the end of the day, after four hours of deliberations over a $10 drug bust, the deadlocked jury was sent home for the night. They came back the next day and tried again. More hours passed. In the end, they pronounced themselves hopelessly hung. A mistrial was declared.

I later spoke with one of the jurors, who told me they had been split, 10 for acquittal and two for a guilty verdict. Many of them had simply mistrusted the eyes. They didn’t believe he could have possibly seen the ginger ale bottle or the v-neck or the key, and they felt his apparent willingness to lie had tainted the prosecution’s whole case.

The prosecution seemed to get the message. On Friday, they said they would not refile the charges. The defendant is now free.

I’m proud of our jury system. I can’t say the same about our police.

Gene Weingarten is a staff writer for The Washington Post.

WWW.FIGHTCOLLECTIONS.COM

Prestigious just to be nominated, and even a greater rarity to be so honored just one time, Jason has bestowed with this honor for the past three years in a row

For an unbelievable third year in a row, Jason A. Shapiro has been named one of the BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA.  Prestigious just to be nominated, and even a greater rarity to be so honored just one time, Jason has bestowed with this honor for the past three years in a row.  Furthermore, Jason is the only lawyer from Howard County to be recognized in the area of Criminal/DUI Defense.

Best Lawyers is the oldest and most respected peer-review publication in the legal profession. Best Lawyers compiles lists of outstanding attorneys by conducting exhaustive peer-review surveys in which thousands of leading lawyers confidentially evaluate their professional peers. The current, 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in America (2010), is based on more than 2.8 million detailed evaluations of lawyers by other lawyers.

Because lawyers are not required or allowed to pay a fee to be included, a listing in Best Lawyers is widely regarded within the legal profession as a signal honor, conferred on a lawyer by his or her peers. For more than 25 years, Best Lawyers lists have earned the respect of the profession, the media, and the public, as the most reliable, unbiased source of legal referrals anywhere.

Big congratulations to Jason A. Shapiro for this great honor.

CLICK HERE TO REVIEW JASON’S COMPLETE BIO

"Perhaps one day, the politicians will enact some effective DUI laws, rather than pander to their constituents claiming to be tough on crime. Until then, refuse the test."

Maryland has adopted a law of implied consent that when people are licensed in this State, or drive upon its highways, they will take the breath test.  If not, they could lose their privilege to drive on the roads of Maryland.  Seems straight forward, but things are not what they seem.

Years ago, Maryland’s politicians wanted to crack down on drunk driving.  They adopted the law that said if people adhere to the implied consent and give a breath sample, that breath can be used against them in a criminal prosecution, but the MVA would not preemptively take their licenses.  Obviously, if convicted and points were assessed, the MVA could then weigh in as to whether that driver should be only to continue to drive.  However, if someone refuses to take the breath test, those drivers violate the implied consent law and were presumed to be a threat to public safety.  As a result, the arresting officer would seize the driver’s license, issue a 45 day temporary license, and if a hearing was requested in time, give that driver a MVA hearing within 45 days to determine whether he should be allowed to continue to drive.

Then the politicians decided they needed to get tougher on impaired drivers.  A 45 day temporary license was then issued to two classes of drivers: (1) Those that refused the test; and (2) Those that had a blood alcohol content that exceeded the legal limit.  To make it attractive to take the test, the legislature gave out two different penalties: (1)  Refusers had two choices: (a) a 120 Day suspension or (b)  1 year with an interlock device installed in any car which may be driven by the offender;  (2)  those who took the test also had two choices: (a) a 45 day license suspension or (b) a 45 day restricted license that allowed drivers to drive to and from and in the course of their employment, to counseling, and possibly to school.  For those who took the test, it’s a no-brainer.  All opted for the restricted license.

However, effective October 1, 2008, a law came into effect that makes no sense.   That law creates a third category of drivers for administrative penalties.  It targets the “super drunk,” those who are approximately double the legal limit or more (.15%  blood alcohol content (“BAC”) or more).  For those drivers, no restricted license is an option, despite a driver’s compliance with Maryland’s law of implied consent.  Instead only two sanctions are available:  (1) a 90 day license suspension, or (2)  1 year with an interlock device installed in any car which may be driven by the offender.

The reason why this law makes no sense is because almost all first offenders are more concerned about the loss of license than criminal prosecution.  Therefore, they take the test, hoping to blow under .15% BAC.  However, many misjudge how much they have consumed and thus, not only do they offer the prosecution a breath sample to be offered in evidence against them, they also subject themselves to same MVA sanctions if they had refuse the breath test (the 1 year interlock).  Thus, the politicians have created a situation for first time offenders where, unless very little alcohol was consumed, it makes more sense to refuse to take the breath test. The MVA sanction will most likely be the same if one refuses or takes the test, but by refusing the driver gives us a more than likely chance of having the criminal prosecution dismissed.  Furthermore, although the politicians say that these laws are necessary to get impaired drivers off of the streets, the politicians merely made the laws tougher but did not appropriate enough money to hire judges and clerks to carry out the new tough laws.  As a result, extensions to the 45 day temporary license are routinely issued as it may take three to four months before a driver’s MVA hearing will be scheduled.  So much for getting the dangerous drivers off the road in less than 45 days.

How does the repeat offender fare under the new breath test law effective October 1, 2008?  Forget about taking the test, as there is zero incentive to give a breath sample.  Refuse, blow over .15% BAC, or blow just a bit over the limit, either way, the MVA will not give a restricted license.  Therefore, it’s either a suspension or the interlock. Thus, the law encourages drivers to refuse, as he MVA sanction will be the same, but a refusal allows us to have a fighting chance to achieve an acquittal.

Perhaps one day, the politicians will enact some effective DUI laws, rather than pander to their constituents claiming to be tough on crime.  Until then, refuse the test.

By: Jason A. Shapiro

where else can you make $100 in 10 seconds?

Shapiro & Mack will be offering a $100.00 American Express Gift Card to the creator of the best 10-30 second video commercial for the firm.

Please look at our website (http://www.shapiroandmack.com)and make a short video commercial using any means that you like.  The video can be all text, all audio, or have live actors – the creator has complete creative control.

The video must be sent to smvideocontest@gmail.com, and then video will be uploaded to youtube and posted on our facebook fan page. All video makers will remain anonymous unless and until we have permission to use your name. The only requirement is that the video must be about Howard County’s Premier Criminal Defense Firm, Shapiro & Mack.

David Zwanetz will pick the winner, using comments on the site and private polls, on January 20, 2010.

The $100.00 American Express Gift Card will be sent to the winner on January 20, 2010.

$100.00 IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE HOLIDAYS! WHERE ELSE CAN YOU MAKE $100.00 FOR 10 SECONDS OF WORK??

After Devin “Devon” O’Brian Dixon was shot trying to rob a drug dealer in 2005, Nathaniel Quick came to his aid, driving his friend to the hospital in critical condition.

“He took him to the emergency room,” recalled Celestine Howard, Quick’s grandmother. “That was years ago. He hadn’t seen Devon for years.”

Over the weekend, according to county police, Dixon fired 21 bullets at a west Columbia house where a crowded Halloween party was in progress, striking and killing Aaron Brice, 19, of Silver Spring.

One of the bullets also hit Quick — paralyzing the young man who helped save Dixon four years earlier.

It wasn’t the first time police have accused Dixon, 22, of carrying a gun in quiet Howard County. It also wasn’t the first time Dixon has been charged with committing a crime against one of his friends.

But the Nov. 1 shooting in the 11500 block of Manorstone Lane was the most violent and serious of a series of charges against Dixon that include four separate convictions and three separate felony indictments.

Most recently, in late 2007, Dixon was sent away to prison on a three-year sentence for illegal gun possession. Had he not been released early for good behavior, he still would have been in prison at the time of the shooting.

“Can they get guns so fast?” Howard asked. “It’s unfortunate. I feel bad for the young man who died.

“I feel so sorry for them,” Howard added of Brice’s family. “They had to bury their child.”

Victim ‘a quiet child’

A Howard High graduate who is majoring in finance and business at Bowie State, Quick, 22, set off for the party on Halloween night with a friend, Howard said.

“He is a quiet child,” said his grandmother, who raised him. “He never causes trouble. I knew he was going to the party and I told him, ‘Be safe, Nathaniel.’ ”

But things turned ugly at the party. Police said an argument broke out, and, the next thing Quick knew, he heard gunfire and felt a pain in the back.

“All he knows is he got hit in the back,” Howard said. “He didn’t see Devon there. I don’t why Devon was there or what his problem was. To be shooting people outside? That’s a mystery to me.”

Howard said police told her that the bullet that struck her grandson ricocheted off a window and was not intended for Quick.

“He’s hanging in there,” she said of her grandson, whom she has visited every day at the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center. “He’s paralyzed from the waist down. He knows it, but it hasn’t really hit him.

“He used to walk every day. He loves to walk. He just bought two new pairs of sneakers. Now he says, ‘Grandma, I don’t have any legs. Grandma, my legs.’ ”

Howard said Dixon came to visit her shortly after the shooting. Upon learning that Quick was paralyzed, he looked distraught, she said.

“He asked, ‘How was Nathaniel,’ and I said, ‘Well, he’s paralyzed from the waist down.’ He just walked out, like he was so in pain or hurt,” Howard said.

Long criminal record

Dixon’s adult criminal record began only days after he became an adult. Less than one month after his 18th birthday, a Howard County police SWAT team was raiding his former residence in Columbia — the first of two times the tactical unit would be called to deal with Dixon.

In February of 2005, Howard County police suspected Dixon of being “in possession of a handgun,” and obtained a search warrant for his home in the 8800 block of Hayshed Lane, according to an investigation done by officers James Iacarino and Brian Tanhauser.
On Feb. 11, 2005, at 5:30 a.m., tactical officers rammed in the front door of the home, damaging the lock, and searched Dixon’s bedroom.

There, officers found 63 rounds of .22-caliber ammunition, a jar with marijuana residue and bags used for packaging drugs, police said. Dixon was charged with marijuana possession and struck a plea deal for probation later that year.

A few months later, Dixon was shot while attempting to rob a drug dealer working out of a barbershop.

On July 17, 2005, according to police, Dixon and another man entered the Barber King salon in the Long Reach Village Center  at 1 a.m. and attempted the robbery. Gunfire broke out and an unarmed Dixon was struck by a bullet. He was rushed to Howard County General Hospital by Quick, whom police described as a “friend.”

Dixon was sentenced to 110 days, after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit robbery.

Drug charges initially filed against Quick were dismissed because of insufficient evidence, said Wayne Kirwan, a spokesman for the Howard County State’s Attorney’s Office.

Out of jail, back in trouble

After serving several months in jail, Dixon was released and, court records show, went back to committing crimes.

On Aug. 20, 2006, he beat and robbed a man outside his Hayshed Lane house, causing the SWAT team to engage him in a “standoff,” according to police.

The victim in the case told police he was robbed by two suspects who struck him from behind and stole his cell phone. When the two ran into Dixon’s home, police used a tactical unit to “peacefully” talk them into surrendering, according to court records.

After a search of the house, police said they found empty gel capsules and other evidence of drug distribution.

“Dixon admitted to his involvement in the robbery,” wrote Cpl. Justin Baker in charging documents. “Dixon also admitted the pills and powder … was ecstasy. Dixon advised he had not sold (drugs) for a long period of time.”

He pleaded guilty to illegal possession of a firearm and was sentenced to three years in prison Aug. 28, 2007.

Before that sentencing, Dixon, who was out on bail, was charged with yet another crime.

On April 12, 2007, he was accused of burglarizing his friend’s house in the 8500 block of Winter Pasture Way, in Columbia. Dixon was friends with the family’s son, but that didn’t stop him from sneaking inside the house to steal the family’s PlayStation 3 video game system, according to charging documents.

On Dec. 12, 2007, Dixon was sentenced to 18 months in prison after pleading guilty to misdemeanor theft in the case.

Johns Hopkins criminologist Doug Ward said cases such as Dixon’s — which show escalating criminal behavior with no rehabilitation — present a problem for law enforcement all over the country.

“This is a big problem everywhere,” he said. “We call it a criminal justice system, but it’s not much of a system. There are competing interests here. You have police officers who are trying to build good cases …. and you have a so-called correctional system, where part of the goal is to keep them in prison and part is to get them out as quickly as possible to free up beds.”

Ward said oftentimes parole and probation agents — who are supposed to keep a close eye on newly released inmates — are too overwhelmed by large workloads to do an effective job of monitoring ex-cons.

“Parole and probation agents are supposed to keep watch over them,” he said. “In a lot of cases, it doesn’t happen, and this is one of them.”

Calls to Dixon’s residence, and the office of his former attorney, Ivan Bates, went unreturned.

Dixon, who now lives at the 8000 block of Paul Martin Drive, in Elkridge, is being held without bond at the Howard County Detention Center.

Dean Schroyer, 21, who lives with Dixon, is charged as an accessory to the murder after the fact and with a drug violation, according to police. Schroyer has been released on $50,000 bond. He has no previous criminal record.

Dixon has a preliminary hearing scheduled for Dec. 1 in Howard County District Court.

The home where two men were shot early Sunday morning. The Forest Glen development in which the house sits is a relatively wealthy, secluded area. (Baltimore Sun photo by Algerina Perna / November 1, 2009)

Howard County police on Monday morning announced the arrests of two Elkridge men in the shooting death of a Silver Spring man during a Halloween party over the weekend at a million-dollar brick home in Columbia.

Devin “Devon” O’Brian Dixon, 22, was charged with the murder of Aaron T. Brice, 19, and the attempted murder of Nathaniel Quick, 22, who may be paralyzed as a result of his injury, police said. Dean Schroyer, 21, was charged as an accessory to the murder after the fact and a drug violation, according to police.

Gunfire erupted early Sunday at the 4,600-square-foot home on Manorstone Lane that police said had been rented out for the party. The victims were not residents of the home, which sits on two acres of land near a golf course in a neighborhood usually untouched by crime.

Police said Brice was shot on the driveway of the house and declared dead at the scene — becoming the second homicide victim in the suburban county this year. Quick was sent to Maryland Shock Trauma Center in critical condition, but the Columbia resident was expected to survive. Two more partygoers with injuries that authorities said did not appear to be related to the shooting were sent to Howard County General Hospital.

Witnesses told police that Dixon was the shooter and Schroyer drove the car in which Dixon fled. Warrants were served at the home in the 8000 block of Paul Martin Drive where the suspects live, and police seized a handgun that they believe might have been used in the shooting, along with approximately 3 pounds of marijuana.

Dixon, who was also charged with assault, was being held without bail at the Howard County Detention Center. Schroyer was also at the detention center, being held in lieu of $50,000 bail.

Brice and Quick were among at least 100 young adults who flocked to the party, after word of the event spread through social networking Web sites. Police could not say who organized the party, or allowed it to take place.

Anthony Brice, father of the slain teenager, said his son went with a group from Montgomery County. Brice knew something was wrong when he didn’t hear from his son by his curfew. But it wasn’t until one of those friends called hours later, distraught, that he discovered what had happened. He rushed to the scene looking for more information, but found little.

“It’s unbelievable. I’m thinking it’s a bad dream,” said Brice, 48.

He said his son, who lived at the family’s Silver Spring home, was a grocery-store cashier who worked at a Christian day camp over the summer. He planned to attend Montgomery College in January to study criminal justice. Brice was told his son was shot just as he was leaving the party “because he saw the situation was not good.”

“Crime can be anywhere,” Brice said, adding that kids need to know that just because they’re “going to a million-dollar neighborhood doesn’t mean it’s safe.”

Celestine Howard, Quick’s grandmother, said he was shot in the spine. Quick is a student at Bowie State University, and Howard said he attended the party with a friend who had heard about the event through a social networking Web site.

When police arrived at the home about 1:15 a.m., more than 100 young people were still at the party. Officers said the house was the location of another loud party in June that prompted at least one phone call to 911.

“This summer, there was a similar cadre of cars up and down the street,” said neighbor Rob Weiss, who has lived on the street for a year and a half. “And there were a lot of kids running around, screaming and yelling, pushing and shoving.”

Joanne Powell, listed in land records as the owner of the Columbia house with Dennis Edwards, filed for bankruptcy protection in January. Both owners were facing foreclosure proceedings until the case was dismissed in August. They could not be reached by telephone for a comment, and no one answered the door Sunday afternoon. The house was purchased for $1.6 million three years ago.

Blood stained the driveway less than a dozen feet from the front steps of the house. Signs of damage were visible inside, including a bashed-in staircase.

“What we know from witnesses is there was some kind of ongoing altercation throughout the evening,” Howard County police spokeswoman Sherry Llewellyn said Sunday. “What we don’t know yet is whether that altercation started before the party began. We don’t know what the motive was or what the argument was about.”

Llewellyn said police have no reason to think the shooting was related to gangs or drugs. Neighbors didn’t know what to make of the ruckus.

“We thought it was firecrackers. Then we heard the screams,” said Teri Deuel, who lives behind the house on a neighboring street. “It took us about a half-hour to figure out that somebody got shot.”

Bans Sandhu, who lives nearby, said he heard multiple shots ring out.

“I don’t know how many, but a full magazine,” he said. “Bang, bang, bang, bang, bang.”

Neighbor Fadeke Iluyomade, 51, was working in her study when she heard what sounded to her like fireworks, except louder. “Then suddenly there were a lot of people running, running away from the house. Some were running on my lawn,” she said. “That was when I called the police because I didn’t know what was going on.”

Police said they received a dozen calls in all.

Officers interviewed dozens of potential witnesses into Sunday morning, and shut down Route 108 near the Manorstone Lane intersection for hours as they investigated. The first Howard homicide took place in August, when police said an assisted-living-facility patient suffering from dementia beat a fellow resident to death.

The scene evoked memories of a 2005 incident in Anne Arundel County, where two National Football League teams rented a mansion in a residential neighborhood in Gambrills for a 400-guest party that ended in a non-fatal shooting. Neighbors of the property had earlier complained that the owners of the house were running an unauthorized nightclub where admission was charged. A judge issued an injunction preventing additional events.

Deuel, the neighbor to the rear, said she wished she had called police earlier in the evening when music from the overly boisterous party made her house pulsate.

She didn’t call then, she said, because “we were nice neighbors.” But now, she thinks, if she hadn’t been so nice, police might have broken the party up — “and it wouldn’t have gotten out of control.”

Howard County police are investigating a shooting at a crowded Halloween party in Columbia early Sunday that left one man dead and another in critical condition.

Several partygoers at the residence, in the 11500 bock Manorstone Lane, called police at about 1:15 a.m. Sunday to report that shots had been fired.

Police said Aaron Thomas Brice, 19, of Silver Spring, was found dead in the driveway of the residence. Nathaniel Quick, 22, of Columbia, was found alive in the basement and was transported to the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center, in Baltimore, where he is listed in critical condition. Sherry Llewellyn, a police spokeswoman, said Sunday that Quick is expected to live but may be paralyzed.

Police are offering rewards of up to $5,000 to those with information about the homicide.

Llewellyn said the shooting was the culmination of an argument that had been brewing all evening. She also said the shooting was the second time since June that police had been called to the residence.

Partygoers had rented the residence for the night for the Halloween party, Llewellyn said. Witnesses said that multiple shots were fired in the party that drew more than 100 people, and Llewellyn said that a massive police turnout was necessary to preserve evidence and interview those at the scene.

Two other males from the party were taken to Howard County General Hospital with injuries from an altercation that occurred at about the same time, but Llewellyn declined to give out their names because of their status as witnesses.

Those with info contact Shapiro & Mack @ 410-884-6100